The robot is not suitable for human status
The robot is not suitable for human status
European Parliament and export have argued over the issue of the human status for robots, in January 2017, the first question was raised on this issue. robots as electronic human being were talked about given legal status. the most important and critical question, in this case, was that if the robot is severely harmed by a human or person? experts warned robots against human status, saying that it is not right to give them legal status, because it violates human rights.
European Parliament and export have argued over the issue of the human status for robots, in January 2017, the first question was raised on this issue. robots as electronic human being were talked about given legal status. the most important and critical question, in this case, was that if the robot is severely harmed by a human or person? experts warned robots against human status, saying that it is not right to give them legal status, because it violates human rights.
The main reason for this is that the machine manufacturer is considered responsible for any damage caused by a machine, so if the robot does no harm, then proving who is responsible for it is an important question. if it is given human status then its creator is freed from this obligation, and then the question of who is responsible for the disaster after which it is created is important.
The robbery raised a question on the human rights watch list about who was responsible if someone killed someone after committing violence, then the question was not serious, then the question was important. the commission sought the assassination of robots to make somebody responsible for robots or to ban these robots and to make someone responsible.
sophia,” an advanced, lifelike robot told its creator that it will “destroy humans” at the south by Southwest (SXSW) technology show. the robot which was created by Hanson Robotics, a firm that was founded and is run by David Hanson, made the shocking revelation on the show.
in a question and answer session with the robot, Hanson asks the robot, “do you want to destroy humans? please say no.” Sophia as he is named by his creator, however, makes her intentions clear and unblinkingly answers, “ok. I will destroy humans.”
sophia is made solely of patented silicon. she has been equipped with cameras in her eyes and has more than 62 facial expressions, can make eye contact and can recognize individuals. she also has google chrome’s voice recognition technology and other necessary tools for her to process speech. this allows her to make contact with others, and she has been designed to get smarter and smarter over time. NBC's report indicates that IBM and Intel are also going to put their programs and technologies into the robot
According to the robotic firm, Sophia is a robot that will be used in theme parks and care facilities helping and assisting people with customer service and health treatment. sophia, who has been involved in many interviews before her murderous claim, also listed some of her ambitions earlier. on top of saying, talking to people is her primary function, she hopes to live just like an ordinary person, and her dreams include doing normal things such as going to school, studying, making art, being an entrepreneur and also having her own home and family.
It is worth giving a robot-human status?
Do you think it is worth giving a robot-human status? Perhaps you think that it is worth giving a robot-human status. If the robot gets a human status, it will be beneficial to human beings, but in the future, the loss will be greater than its benefits, Because the robot's thinking ability is like a small child, but in the future it can increase its thinking ability by 100 times, which can be a risk factor for humans. That's why if we control the robot from now on, then it is better for us. And the robot is the mechanism to give it human status, which is contrary to nature-
An autonomous robot acts as a stand-alone system, complete with its own computer (called the controller). The most advanced example is the smart robot, which has a built-in artificial intelligence (ai) system that can learn from its environment and its experience and build on its capabilities based on that knowledge.
This is an important message(AI) Robots- I want to deliver this message to every person, but I can not win individually for everybody, so I want to send this message to everyone from my blog. If you want to save the Earth, from (AI) Robots, then read this message carefully and send it to others so that we can save the planet.
In February, members of the European Parliament passed an amendment on the use of defense funds to produce such deadly and mass destruction and weapons production in the ground, although this amendment will be canceled this week considering the council's request. A Defense Fund was formed to reduce the dependence on US weapons and to make weapons in the European Union. Some mps expressed their fear that developing such killer robots would prove to be obsolete for mankind. There will be no control over humans when they use weapons on the battlefield. Thus these weapons are proven to be for the cause of world peace and for mankind's enemy. Some experts argued that it should be banned internally on the production and consumption of Leethal Autonomous Weapons before it becomes widespread. Last year, 116 industrialists, including Tesla founder Elon Musk, recommended banning such robots, he wrote in a letter that if this Pandora opens, it will be difficult for humans to close it
Now the days of war between robots are not far away, instead of humans in the battlefield. Because the European Union (AI) robots are being developed which in the war, without any help from humans, fight and destroy enemies. These types of robots are named in the technical language Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAW). And in these robots (AI) artificial intelligence has been used.
No comments